From now on, readers will note the lack of references to the Cambodia Daily. Politics have determined that publishing the news should be considered contentious. That's if you fear the light of truth.
The changing climate is also described by this by Phnom Penh Post (Oct. 16):
'Svay Rieng officials on Saturday prevented a local farmer coalition from
conducting a workshop on raising chickens on the grounds it had failed
to get permission from district and provincial authorities, a possible
sign of increased scrutiny of NGOs working in the provinces.
...
The Coalition of Cambodia Farmers Community was conducting the
workshop for 25 families when Ampil commune authorities and police told
them to stop, said Chhem Kosal, a project coordinator with the NGO.
“I informed them that we had informed the commune chief already, and
the commune chief also permitted [it]. But they still required me to ask
for permission from district and provincial levels,” he said'.
Free
Something on-topic. The Phnom Penh Post (Sep. 9) has an extensive article on everything but traditional agricultural varieties:
'The government has denied the presence of genetically modified organisms
(GMOs) in the agricultural sector amid persistent reports that some
local farmers may already be cultivating genetically engineered “hybrid”
seeds, warning that countries could restrict or ban the import of
Cambodian agricultural products if use of the biotechnology is
confirmed.
...
Hean Vanhan, an undersecretary of state at the Ministry of
Agriculture, cast doubt on the veracity of the reports, stating firmly
that Cambodian farmers have never taken up GM seeds – and the government
would like to keep it that way.
“We are still not using any GM seeds for cultivation as they remain
highly controversial in the international market, and we are dependent
on exports so must comply with market trends,” he said. “If we allow
GMOs to exist in our market it would have an impact on our exports as
some countries do not trust them.”
Vanhan noted, however, that the government has never formally banned
GM seeds or issued any regulations to prevent their import or
cultivation “because there is no definitive proof that they are
harmful”.
...
Sam Vitou, executive director of agricultural organisation CEDAC,
said while the government appears to have blocked efforts by Monsanto
and other GMO producers to market their products in Cambodia, there are
fears local farmers could inadvertently be sowing their fields with GM
seeds imported from Thailand, Vietnam and China.
“Even though the Ministry of Agriculture has not opened our market to
Monsanto our agricultural sector could be threatened by the unofficial
flow of [seed imports from] neighbouring countries,” he said.
Vietnam has embraced GMOs, approving at least 14 varieties of GM corn
and eight varieties of GM soybean for cultivation, while indicating
plans to have up to half of its farmland planted with transgenic crops
by 2020. Thailand has waffled on GMO support, taking a more measured
approach after field trials of GM papayas began contaminating nearby
crops, resulting in several countries banning its papayas from their
markets. To date, the country has approved 15 varieties of GM crops,
mostly corn.
...
The confusion extends to the media, which often blurs the line
between hybrid and GM seeds or incorrectly assumes that all Monsanto,
Dow and Syngenta seed varieties are genetically modified.
A news report published online last year by Monash University’s
School of Journalism made the explosive claim that over 100 families in
Kandal province’s Kbal Koh district switched to planting Monsanto GM
corn about a decade ago on the advice of local Agriculture Ministry
officials.
Bun Tounsimona, director of Kandal province’s Agriculture Department,
categorically rejected the report’s claims, insisting he had personally
inspected farms in Kbal Koh district and did not find any GM plantings
there.
“We use only hybrid seeds for corn farming as they provide high
yields, but never GM seeds,” he said, adding that farmers had been
warned not to use GM seeds because of the possible health concerns and
risk it could restrict their exports to certain markets.
...
Four crops – corn, soybean, cotton and canola – account for nearly 99
percent of global GM acreage. GM varieties of rice have been developed
and tested in field trials, but have never been commercially grown.
Hun Lak, vice president of the Cambodia Rice Federation, stressed the
importance of keeping GMOs out of the Kingdom’s rice sector, adding
that Cambodian rice has been tested and certified as GMO-free.
“Our farmers farm according to industry guidelines and market
demands,” he said. “If GM rice is grown it will damage our export market
because it is controversial and overseas buyers don’t trust GMO.”
So there does seem to be reluctance to grow GM crops, but no policy initiatives to avoid GM crops coming in. Naive at the best. Presumably GM corn is already grown with seeds available from neighbouring countries.
Perhaps the following news snippet (Business Monitor, Sept. 27) can enlighten what's going on, though arguably from the Philippines, a country which seems to have less scruples when it comes to growing whatever be it GM crop or not.
'In the Philippines, the cultivation of GM corn, such as the
insect-resistant Bt-corn and roundup-ready corn varieties, is preferred
over hybrid or native varieties because of its benefits, according to
Romero [Gabriel O. Romero, Regulatory Affairs Lead of Monsanto Philippines Inc.].
Romero said that, before, it was only India and the Philippines
planting GM crops in Asia. “Australia has its GM cotton; India has GM
eggplant or Bt eggplant. Now, Myanmar is planting GM cotton,” Rotmero
said sans citing sources.
Romero added that China has been into GM cotton and GM papaya, while Pakistan is now also planting GM cotton.
“Not all of these are ‘legal planting’,” Romero said, adding that
legal planting is only in the Philippines, Vietnam and Australia'.
Basically the article (without any emphasis on the negatives) bandstands Monsanto's objective to steam roll all Asian agriculture, one country at a time. But ultimately all Asian agriculture will see GM crops massively adopted, preferably those of Monsanto.
Royal
A scathing article from the Bangkok Post (Oct. 18) notes a near Perronesque attitude to what the late King stood for. Anyway, it seems the current Thai regime has it's own ideas:
'Unfortunately,
certain authorities recently seem to be doing
things that contradict the late King's principles. This month, the
Department of Agriculture (DOA) appeared to push for an amendment of the
1999 Plant Varieties Protection Act during the period when
Thai people are mourning the late King ahead of the royal cremation
ceremony. The amendment effort is also being criticised for favouring
giant seed companies, enabling them to monopolise the
ownership of certain "patented" plant varieties they developed from
local plants and seeds. Accordingly, it will make it difficult for farmers to be self-reliant.
The law amendment effort is seen to be aligned with the International
Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) Convention of
1991. For decades, big transnational corporations, particularly giant
seed companies, have put pressure on Thailand to accept the 1991 UPOV
Convention.
Biothai, a non-profit organisation working for the protection of
Thailand's biodiversity, issued a warning several years ago that several
international free trade agreements (FTAs), particularly the Thai-US FTA and the Asean-Europe FTA, would force Thailand to
change its laws to comply with the convention. And now it is actually
happening.
The DOA's proposed amendment to the law has been accused of jettisoning farmers' rights to save commercial seeds
and regrow them. Violators risk facing criminal charges in which the
punishment is a jail term or a fine or both.
However,
the DOA has denied the allegation, saying that, under the
proposed bill, small-scale farmers can still keep seeds for replanting,
while plant variety study and innovation research will be expanded to
create new strains that will bolster exports of agricultural products.
...
Still,
it is stipulated in Section 35 of the bill that replanting
must be carried out for the purpose of plant variety breeding and it
must receive approval from a committee authorised to designate which
plant varieties will be restricted or banned from
replanting.
In layman's terms, farmers will not be allowed to save commercial crop
seeds and regrow them to make a living and feed their families. What
they can do is buy new seeds from companies for new cultivation.
...
Instead of pushing for this new law, which is seen as favouring a
handful of seed firms and limiting the rights of millions of farmers,
the department should have followed the late King's valuable example'.
Stocktaking
Away from the controversy, exports of rice from Cambodia are ever increasing. The Phnom Penh Post (Oct. 6 ):
'Cambodian rice exports increased nearly 17 percent during the
first nine months compared to the same period last year, with exporters
pushing to fill orders under China’s higher import quota as European
markets remained steady.
A total of 421,900 tonnes of rice was exported between January and
September, a 16.7 percent increase compared to the first nine months of
2016, according to government data published yesterday.
China – which has agreed to accept 200,000 tonnes of rice this year –
was the top destination for rice shipments, receiving 124,700 tonnes
during the period, with 53,900 tonnes and 35,400 tonnes delivered to
France and Poland, respectively'.
More in the pipeline, with the deal with Bangladesh becoming reality. The Phnom Penh Post (Sep. 29):
'Cambodia and Bangladesh have finalised terms on a massive rice deal
that could see up to 1 million tonnes of rice purchased from the Kingdom
over the next five years, with the first shipment due to begin by
November, a source close to the deal said yesterday.
Hun Lak, vice president of the Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF),
confirmed that an agreement had been made between the two governments
after the relevant ministries signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU)
in August that hoped to replenish Bangladesh’s stockpiles after heavy
flooding earlier this year decimated the country’s crops.
...
He added that the deal, which will be managed by the state-run
company Green Trade, allows for flexibility in the next harvest season
that will begin in January. While he declined to provide the agreed upon
price for the deal, he said that the current market price for Cambodian
white rice was at $430 a tonne.
In late August, Reuters news agency reported that Bangladesh had
agreed to purchase Cambodian rice at $453 a tonne, while local officials
insisted that price negotiations were still ongoing'.
How to develop the sector? A double take from the remaining news source on improving storage and drying facilities. The Phnom Penh Post (Sep. 13):
'The government-run Rural Development Bank (RDB) has extended the
deadline to receive proposals from registered Cambodian agricultural
firms to develop rice storage and drying facilities after receiving a
tepid response to its finance offer, a bank official said yesterday'.
Phnom Penh Post (Sep. 26):
'The state-run Rural Development Bank (RDB) received a total of 10
proposals from Cambodian agricultural firms expressing interest in
developing rice storage and drying facilities across three provinces
using government-backed low-interest loans, a bank official said
yesterday.
Kao Thach, chief executive of RDB, said six more companies submitted
proposals for the $15 million finance package after the bank extended
the application deadline from September 8 to September 22 due to a low
response. Only four companies submitted proposals during the initial
three-week call for submissions.
...
The storage facilities are intended to alleviate the stress on farmers
and millers when rice stockpiles begin to stack up and are expected to
be operational by the start of the next harvest season in January.
...
Earlier this year RDB awarded a $15 million low-interest loan to
Thanakea Srov (Kampuchea) Plc, the operator of the Cambodian Rice Bank,
to expand its rice storage warehouse in Battambang province.
The warehouse is set to be the first privately owned centralised
storage facility with a capacity to store 200,000 tonnes of wet paddy
rice and to process 3,000 tonnes of paddy rice daily'.
Direction
Thailand's The Nation (Oct. 2) looks at proposed new taxing:
'Citing its likely impact of further impoverishing already vulnerable
rice farmers, some academics and farming leaders are slamming a proposed
new national water-use policy that would tax farmers for irrigating
their fields.
...
In the volume-based billing system, water costs would range from Bt0.5
per cubic metre of water for agriculture and animal husbandry, Bt1-Bt3
per cubic metre for tourism-oriented businesses, restaurants, and
recreation businesses, and more than Bt3 per cubic metre for large-scale
use such as large farms, industry, and power generation.
Economics lecturer Decharut Sukkumnoed from Kasetsart University, is
concerned that the seemingly sensible approach would end up further
hurting already struggling farm families. Collecting a water bill from
farmers would intensify their financial difficulties by generating a new
expense at a time when increased farming costs and decreased crop
prices are already resulting in deficits among small farmers'.
Concerning price and market. The Nation (Sep. 30):
'Charoen Laothamatas, president of the Thai Rice Exporters Association, said yesterday that growing strength of the
Thai currency has negatively impacted on the country’s exports of rice
and other farm products such as rubber |sheet, tapioca and sugar. These
products have 90 per cent local content, so the baht’s rise makes them
more expensive than those of our competitors.
“The Thai currency has risen by 8.5 per
cent against the US dollar, whereas the Vietnam dong has just risen 2
per cent against the greenback, resulting in Thai rice exporters losing
market shares to their counterparts in Vietnam ,” he said'.
Bangkok Post (Oct. 17):
'Strong overseas demand for Thai rice is expected to support prices even
as an influx of around 25 million tonnes of the 2017/18 major crop is
about to flood the market next month, say industry officials.
Thai Rice Exporters Association president Charoen Laothammatas said
hefty demand from the overseas markets could push 2017 rice exports to
10.8 million tonnes, nearly matching the record high of 10.9 million
tonnes in 2014'.
What says the competition?
An interesting article from Vietnam.net (Oct. 8) looks forward and sees that rice is not the export flagship all regard:
'Phong
[Hoang Ngoc Phong, deputy director of the Economic Development
Consultancy Center] stressed that it is necessary to find a new
direction for the
delta development by changing the agricultural production model.
...
“Agriculture doesn’t always mean rice cultivation. It would be better to
reduce the rice growing area to a reasonable level. We don’t strive to
grow rice to export rice products at low prices, because farmers cannot
make profits, while the state has to make heavy investments,” he said.
Phong went on to say that instead of trying to prevent saline intrusion, Mekong Delta should adapt to it.
In fact, in many localities, people have adapted to the saltwater
intrusion when changing the crop structure. They have one rice crop and
one shrimp/fish crop instead of two rice crops a year'.
But the above note is but a sideline, see this article from nhandan.com (Oct. 17):
'The
Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) has set the target of raising
Vietnam’s rice export revenues to between US$2.3 and 2.5 billion by
2030.
The target
was announced at a conference on realising Vietnam’s rice export
strategy during the 2017-2020 period, with a view towards 2030.
Under the strategy, Vietnam will gradually reduce its rice export
volumes whilst increasing the proportion of high-earning varieties, with
the annual volume for the 2017-2020 period targeted at 4.5-5 million
tonnes and shrinking to 4 million tonnes by 2030'.
It could be argued that growing less would result in higher prices thus achieving the same return with less effort ...
From afar this article in the Guardian (Sep. 24 ):
'India is rice country: the cereal provides daily sustenance
for more than 60% of the population. Half a century ago, it was home to
more than 100,000 rice varieties, encompassing a stunning diversity in taste, nutrition, pest-resistance and, crucially in this age of climate change and natural disasters, adaptability to a range of conditions.
Today, much of this biodiversity is irretrievably lost, forced out by the quest for high-yield hybrids and varieties encouraged by government agencies. Such “superior” varieties now cover more than 80% of India’s rice acreage'.
It
then describes a local Orissa state initiative to save it's own varieties and
seeds to increase the ability to be independent of outside agents be
they government or privateers.
'By reviving seeds, they are also reviving food, taste, ritual,
nutrition, and sustainability – attributes often forgotten as a result
of the obsession with yield. Attributes that make rice more than just a
bundle of calories and starch'.
Suited
From rice to veggie growing. The Phnom Penh Post (Oct. 6) gives space for vegetable growing initiatives:
'German development agency GIZ held a consultation workshop in Phnom Penh
yesterday for its two-year Facilitating Trade in Agricultural Goods in
Asean (FTAG) initiative, holding discussions with Ministry of
Agriculture officials and local traders aimed at identifying the most
suitable fruit and vegetable crops for cross-border trade between
Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam'.
'A $20 million Ministry of Agriculture programme has struggled to meet
its goal of introducing 160 tonnes a day of high-quality locally
produced vegetables to the market, with ministry officials saying that
as a result of high production costs and pricing issues it was currently
supplying less than a third of that amount.
...
Kean Sophea, deputy director of the Department of Horticulture and
Subsidiary Crops at the Ministry of Agriculture, said that while the
programme had so far signed on 2,060 farmers and 260 rice cooperatives,
disagreements between farmers and buyers over prices had led to its poor
performance.
“Farmers are ready to farm and sell following our food safety
standards, but buyers complain about the higher prices and consumers are
not happy either,” he said.
“The main challenge is still between farmer, buyer and consumer and
until that is solved we will only be able to supply 50 tonnes per day.”
Pluses
Vientiane Times (Oct. 9) looks at coffee growing:
'The value of coffee exported by Laos is expected to exceed US$112
million in the 2017 fiscal year, an increase of 3 percent compared to
2016.
Coffee exports topped US$74 million in the
first six months of this year, an increase of US$50 million compared to
the same period in 2016.
...
Association Office Head Mr Sivixay Xayaseng told Vientiane Times on
Friday that many companies have supported and encouraged local farmers
to grow more coffee under the 2+3 system and to set a purchasing plan
before reporting the figures to the Ministry of Industry and Commerce.
The 2+3 policy is a government initiative that
encourages investors and land owners to partner in industrial tree
plantations.
The system refers to a framework where farmers
must provide land and labour while investors provide funding, technical
support and a ready market for growers'.
And this (Vientiane Times, Oct. 16):
'The government is planning to develop coffee-rich Bolaven Plateau in
southern Laos as the country’s top agri-business and agri-tourism
destination due to its perfect climate and fertile volcanic soils.
A master plan for developing the plateau is
being drafted by the National Economic Research Institute to ensure
sustainable development in Bolaven'.
Life
Bangkok Post (Oct. 1) has an expansive exposé of rice growers choosing for organic growing with the only alternative being growing sugar cane:
'A new machine stands quietly in a corner of a small rice mill
north of Amnat Charoen town. Its operation will commence at the end of
this year, marking an important step for local farmers to boost
their rice production.
...
When local farmers talk about "changing the world", it means
supplying premium organic produce to the market. In return, they receive
a reasonable income that lifts up their livelihood.
...
The
self-determination movement of local farmers in Amnat Charoen is
challenging the perspective of the central government and the entire
agriculture sector, whose direction is determined by top-down policies.
Promoting large-scale farming is on the agenda of the current military
regime too, leading to conflict and public scepticism about whether it
can save farmers in the long run.
...
At first, organic rice farmer Isara Keaodee didn't know who came to
buy paddy fields in his community in Amnat Charoen's Nam Plik
subdistrict.
It started with a few plots, then more.
The purchaser offered enticing prices for each plot. Farmers mired in
debt could hardly resist such offers that delivered quick cash. Some
sold their land without knowing the consequences.
It later became clear that each small tract pieced together in a
large land plot, where a new sugar cane mill and a 61-megawatt biomass
power plant will be soon built.
The mill, with a total daily processing capacity of 20,000 tonnes of
sugar cane, will be run by Kalasin Mitr Sugar Company Limited, owned by
Thailand's and Asia's biggest sugar and bioenergy producer Mitr Phol
Group. The biomass plant will be fed by bagasse.
The advent of the sugar industry has raised concerns among organic
rice farmers. Most of their fears concern herbicides and chemical
fertiliser used in sugar cane plantations. Water seizure by cane
monoculture is another major worry.
...
Funded by money from their own pockets, a group of organic farmers
toured communities around sugar cane mills in the Northeast to get more
information.
"I've seen many farmers suffer when they produce only to serve
factories. They produce fast. They get support. But they are in great
debt from purchasing chemicals and fertilisers to boost growth to catch
up with the factories' demand," says Mr Isara.
"They don't actually hold market shares. They have very low negotiation power."
Two public hearings on a sugar cane mill and a biomass power plant
were held at Nam Plik. Protesters claimed that the hearings did not
provide complete information about the pros and cons of the project.
When Spectrum [= Bangkok Post] requested an interview with
Mitr Phol, we were told by its public relations department that the
executive who can comment was abroad'.
Finally, following a very interesting and intriguing video describing life in the Lao highlands. It notes the difficulties facing agriculture, practises in using chemical herbicides and eking out a living with hunting and collecting.
More can be found here.
'This video is Part 2 of the 3-part series that covers the lives of the villagers in Houay Len over a 12-month period. It looks at the lives of three Phong women Mrs. Tong, Mrs. Bua and Mrs. Chueng and examines local women’s lives during the production season from April to August. The women talk about the work that goes into getting fields ready for planting rice and maize, as well as how they feel about pesticides and why they are used in the village. We also learn more about nutrition and where Houay Len’s villagers get their food'.